Chapter
A New Reviewing System for Scientific Papers
2:19:07 - 2:29:34 (10:26)
This podcast explores a new system for reviewing scientific papers in which papers are evaluated based on the worthiness of their ideas rather than just the quality of their experiments or protocols, and how relying on the opinions of trusted groups or individuals can save time.
Clips
The impact of a scientific paper should not solely be based on the quality of the experiments done, but rather the influence it has on the way people think about the problem.
2:19:07 - 2:23:27 (04:19)
Summary
The impact of a scientific paper should not solely be based on the quality of the experiments done, but rather the influence it has on the way people think about the problem. The field of science has a tendency to create a culture where people only chase numbers on benchmarks rather than focusing on the bigger picture.
ChapterA New Reviewing System for Scientific Papers
Episode#258 – Yann LeCun: Dark Matter of Intelligence and Self-Supervised Learning
PodcastLex Fridman Podcast
The proposed reviewing system involves posting research papers on a repository like Archive or Open Review, where a group of reviewers can evaluate the papers and save time for authors.
2:23:27 - 2:25:45 (02:18)
Summary
The proposed reviewing system involves posting research papers on a repository like Archive or Open Review, where a group of reviewers can evaluate the papers and save time for authors. The reviewing entity can choose to review a paper spontaneously or not.
ChapterA New Reviewing System for Scientific Papers
Episode#258 – Yann LeCun: Dark Matter of Intelligence and Self-Supervised Learning
PodcastLex Fridman Podcast
The combination of library science and computer science can enhance the impact of communication and research through accurate credit allocation to authors, but it may not be enough to incentivize thorough paper reading and appreciation.
2:25:45 - 2:29:34 (03:48)
Summary
The combination of library science and computer science can enhance the impact of communication and research through accurate credit allocation to authors, but it may not be enough to incentivize thorough paper reading and appreciation.