Chapter
Challenging Hypotheses and Objectivity in Science
1:21:04 - 1:27:31 (06:27)
In this podcast, the speaker discusses the use of the term "science" as a way to justify subjective beliefs and how the process of science should instead involve inquiry and challenging hypotheses. They also touch on the controversy surrounding Joe Rogan's comments on vaccines and the need for informed discussion on the topic.
Clips
The importance of having a variety of viewpoints available to challenge ourselves, and the danger of restricting debate by silencing different voices.
1:21:04 - 1:25:14 (04:09)
Perspectives
Summary
The importance of having a variety of viewpoints available to challenge ourselves, and the danger of restricting debate by silencing different voices.
ChapterChallenging Hypotheses and Objectivity in Science
EpisodeE66: $FB's major pullback, Rogan/Spotify mess, Xi/Putin meetup and understanding supply chain issues with Bestie Guestie Ryan Petersen (Flexport CEO)
PodcastAll-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Science should be a process of inquiry and challenging hypotheses to arrive at objective truth.
1:25:14 - 1:27:31 (02:17)
Science
Summary
Science should be a process of inquiry and challenging hypotheses to arrive at objective truth. However, politicians often misuse the term to push their own beliefs, while individuals may prefer to wait and see with new technologies like mRNA vaccines.