Chapter
Clips
A jury's perception can be influenced by things as small as a lawyer's mannerisms during trial.
36:30 - 39:35 (03:04)
Summary
A jury's perception can be influenced by things as small as a lawyer's mannerisms during trial. The way a legal team visually presents their argument can have a big impact on the outcome of the trial.
ChapterConcerns over potential jury reactions in Alex Murdaugh case
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
The hosts speculate on whether or not Alex Murdaugh will testify in his own case, with one host suggesting that it is unlikely due to his previous statements and potential for cross-examination.
39:35 - 40:43 (01:07)
Summary
The hosts speculate on whether or not Alex Murdaugh will testify in his own case, with one host suggesting that it is unlikely due to his previous statements and potential for cross-examination.
ChapterConcerns over potential jury reactions in Alex Murdaugh case
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
The possibility of Alex Murdaugh testifying in his own case is explored, with the consensus being that his lawyer, Dick Harpootlian, is unlikely to allow it.
40:43 - 41:27 (00:44)
Summary
The possibility of Alex Murdaugh testifying in his own case is explored, with the consensus being that his lawyer, Dick Harpootlian, is unlikely to allow it. Murdaugh's previous eight-minute speech in court was described as "the stupidest thing...it didn't help his chance at bond whatsoever".
ChapterConcerns over potential jury reactions in Alex Murdaugh case
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
The episode features a conversation about a bond dispute between two individuals and their disagreement over the bond amount.
41:27 - 42:19 (00:52)
Summary
The episode features a conversation about a bond dispute between two individuals and their disagreement over the bond amount. The speakers also comment on one person's lack of coherence in their argument.