Chapter
Developments in Obstruction Investigation Related to Mar-a-Lago
09:54 - 19:37 (09:42)
Evan Corcoran, former president Trump's attorney, testifying in the grand jury about his communications with Trump regarding Mar-a-Lago could be significant in the ongoing obstruction investigation. The most sensitive documents related to the case are unlikely to be prosecuted due to the mishandling of classified information.
Clips
Evan Corcoran, former President Trump's attorney, testifying about his communications with the former president could be a significant piece of evidence in the obstruction investigation by Jack Smith.
09:54 - 16:19 (06:24)
Summary
Evan Corcoran, former President Trump's attorney, testifying about his communications with the former president could be a significant piece of evidence in the obstruction investigation by Jack Smith. The classified documents of highest level likely won't be subject to any type of 793 offense due to their sensitivity.
ChapterDevelopments in Obstruction Investigation Related to Mar-a-Lago
EpisodeProsecuting Donald Trump: A Primer
PodcastProsecuting Donald Trump
The special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller has used unusual tactics in handling the case of Paul Manafort, who had written two letters to the Department of Justice through his counsel upon taking over the investigation.
16:20 - 18:05 (01:45)
Summary
The special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller has used unusual tactics in handling the case of Paul Manafort, who had written two letters to the Department of Justice through his counsel upon taking over the investigation.
ChapterDevelopments in Obstruction Investigation Related to Mar-a-Lago
EpisodeProsecuting Donald Trump: A Primer
PodcastProsecuting Donald Trump
The attorney-client privilege may not apply to information shared by Donald Trump and Mr. Corcoran, as it is likely that the client was involved in a crime.
18:05 - 19:37 (01:31)
Summary
The attorney-client privilege may not apply to information shared by Donald Trump and Mr. Corcoran, as it is likely that the client was involved in a crime. While attorney-client information may not need to be fraud-related for a lawyer to be involved, in this case, the information may not be protected under attorney-client privilege.