Chapter
Energy Department Concludes That Lab Leak in China is Likely Cause of Coronavirus Pandemic
Some US officials have said that the Energy Department's conclusion that an accidental lab leak in China is the likely cause of the coronavirus pandemic is made with low confidence due to weak information. US spy agencies remain divided over the origins of the virus.
Clips
The United States may be involved in Ukraine as a means of wasting Russian resources by keeping a proxy war in a third world country going.
01:30 - 03:35 (02:05)
Summary
The United States may be involved in Ukraine as a means of wasting Russian resources by keeping a proxy war in a third world country going. Additionally, it is suggested that China's goal is to become the next economic superpower.
ChapterEnergy Department Concludes That Lab Leak in China is Likely Cause of Coronavirus Pandemic
Episode#52 Andrew Bustamante - CIA Spy / U.S. vs China - The New Cold War | Part 2
PodcastShawn Ryan Show
US spy agencies are divided over the origins of the virus, but the Energy Department has concluded that an accidental laboratory leak in China is the most likely cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to American officials.
03:35 - 06:19 (02:43)
Summary
US spy agencies are divided over the origins of the virus, but the Energy Department has concluded that an accidental laboratory leak in China is the most likely cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to American officials. The topic has caused concern and raised questions regarding the cause of the pandemic.
ChapterEnergy Department Concludes That Lab Leak in China is Likely Cause of Coronavirus Pandemic
Episode#52 Andrew Bustamante - CIA Spy / U.S. vs China - The New Cold War | Part 2
PodcastShawn Ryan Show
Intelligence officials are divided on the Energy Department's conclusion regarding intelligence on a certain matter.
06:19 - 09:10 (02:50)
Summary
Intelligence officials are divided on the Energy Department's conclusion regarding intelligence on a certain matter. Some say it was relatively weak and made with low confidence, while others believe it had a high likelihood, causing confusion among agencies.