Chapter
Examining the Confession in Jason Carroll’s Case
41:58 - 48:36 (06:37)
The confession in Jason Carroll's case remains a sore thumb and a point of scrutiny. The defense argues that the confession of the co-defendant was used to distract the jurors from the real evidence.
Clips
An anonymous insider reveals the impact of individual jurors during the deliberation process in a high-profile criminal trial.
41:58 - 45:06 (03:08)
Summary
An anonymous insider reveals the impact of individual jurors during the deliberation process in a high-profile criminal trial. The insider also expresses concern about the tactics used by the defense team and their attempts to distract jurors from the confession presented as evidence.
ChapterExamining the Confession in Jason Carroll’s Case
EpisodeEpisode 5: Trial in a Trial
PodcastBear Brook
After six hours and 46 minutes of deliberation, the jury acquitted Tony Puff of all charges, despite witness testimony from Lammy which was deemed untrustworthy, as the newspaper editorial published after the acquittal referred to Lammy's credibility gap.
45:06 - 46:45 (01:38)
Summary
After six hours and 46 minutes of deliberation, the jury acquitted Tony Puff of all charges, despite witness testimony from Lammy which was deemed untrustworthy, as the newspaper editorial published after the acquittal referred to Lammy's credibility gap.
ChapterExamining the Confession in Jason Carroll’s Case
EpisodeEpisode 5: Trial in a Trial
PodcastBear Brook
Inconsistent theories were presented in a murder case where Tony was found not guilty by the jury and the state let Ken go due to lack of evidence.
46:45 - 48:36 (01:51)
Summary
Inconsistent theories were presented in a murder case where Tony was found not guilty by the jury and the state let Ken go due to lack of evidence. The confession of Jason remains the major point of discussion in the state's theory which had started falling apart.