Chapter
Free Speech and Consequence
31:53 - 39:16 (07:22)
Discussion on the notion that freedom of speech means freedom from consequence and how it is a misguided idea.
Clips
In the case of Bland v. Roberts in 2013, it was ruled that Facebook likes are protected as free speech under the First Amendment.
31:53 - 33:28 (01:35)
Summary
In the case of Bland v. Roberts in 2013, it was ruled that Facebook likes are protected as free speech under the First Amendment. This raises a new set of questions about the regulations and limitations of free speech on social media platforms.
ChapterFree Speech and Consequence
EpisodeSelects: How Free Speech Works
PodcastStuff You Should Know
The speaker expresses his thoughts on the common misconception that freedom of speech means freedom from consequences, stating that as long as physical harm is not inflicted on someone, emotional harm should be considered.
33:28 - 37:22 (03:54)
Summary
The speaker expresses his thoughts on the common misconception that freedom of speech means freedom from consequences, stating that as long as physical harm is not inflicted on someone, emotional harm should be considered. He argues against the idea that people can use free speech to avoid facing the outcome of their words.
ChapterFree Speech and Consequence
EpisodeSelects: How Free Speech Works
PodcastStuff You Should Know
The speaker shares their habit of trying to decipher the reason for the use of "S-I-C" in written articles and highlights how it helps in understanding the mistakes or modifications made in the original text.
37:24 - 39:16 (01:51)
Summary
The speaker shares their habit of trying to decipher the reason for the use of "S-I-C" in written articles and highlights how it helps in understanding the mistakes or modifications made in the original text.