Chapter
Judicial Discretion in Foreign Policy
3:59:58 - 4:05:17 (05:19)
The concept of a judge changing their decision making based on anything other than the raw inputs can often lead to bad outcomes. This is especially prominent in foreign policy, where judges can exhibit jurisdiction shopping or bias towards a certain attitude or country, leading to unreliable outcomes.
Clips
The American state lacks strategy and coordination, whereas a military parade is an example of lawful evil.
3:59:58 - 4:00:53 (00:54)
Summary
The American state lacks strategy and coordination, whereas a military parade is an example of lawful evil. Tech and crypto bros should learn history and humanities and not just focus on foreign policies.
ChapterJudicial Discretion in Foreign Policy
Episode#547: Balaji Srinivasan — Centralized China vs Decentralized World, The DeFi Matrix, Ascending vs Descending Trends, Bitcoin Mining as Energy Storage, Reputational Civil War, and Maximalism vs. Optimalism
PodcastThe Tim Ferriss Show
The concept of judicial discretion in decision-making based on personal preference rather than raw inputs is flawed and can lead to an unreliable and irregular judiciary system.
4:00:53 - 4:05:17 (04:24)
Summary
The concept of judicial discretion in decision-making based on personal preference rather than raw inputs is flawed and can lead to an unreliable and irregular judiciary system. The recent failures of the foreign policy and military establishment in managing COVID and Afghanistan highlight the need for new and fresh minds to step in and take action.