Chapter
Clips
The defense team in the Russell Lafitte case has raised concerns about the blood spatter evidence, prompting prosecutors to take a closer look.
01:29 - 02:34 (01:04)
Summary
The defense team in the Russell Lafitte case has raised concerns about the blood spatter evidence, prompting prosecutors to take a closer look. However, some believe the state's reassessment is being overestimated and the issue is nuanced.
ChapterRussell Files Motion for New Trial
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
The discussion covers the filing of a lawsuit against Alex Jones and the motion for a new trial in the Russell Taylor case.
02:34 - 03:20 (00:46)
Summary
The discussion covers the filing of a lawsuit against Alex Jones and the motion for a new trial in the Russell Taylor case. The jurors gave notes after deliberating for almost 10 hours; some say they were getting bullied.
ChapterRussell Files Motion for New Trial
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
The handling of the Dylann Roof trial has come under scrutiny after it was revealed that two jurors were dismissed, allegedly due to their race.
03:20 - 06:42 (03:21)
Summary
The handling of the Dylann Roof trial has come under scrutiny after it was revealed that two jurors were dismissed, allegedly due to their race. There have also been questions raised over whether Judge Richard Gergel unfairly substituted these jurors.
ChapterRussell Files Motion for New Trial
EpisodeCup of Justice Bonus 10: Dick and Jim Win the Headline Game In Murder Hearing But What Really Happened?
PodcastMurdaugh Murders Podcast
There are predictions that Russell Taylor's sentence will be significant due to his alleged hubris and the possible argument of procedural error on appeal.
06:42 - 08:30 (01:48)
Summary
There are predictions that Russell Taylor's sentence will be significant due to his alleged hubris and the possible argument of procedural error on appeal. There may also be mention of his involvement with Russell TV during the sentencing.