Chapter
Sabrina Limon's Case: Questioning Intent
1:16:51 - 1:19:45 (02:54)
The validity of Jonathan Hearn's testimony and its corroborating evidence in proving Sabrina Limon's intent to kill her husband is questioned in the podcast. The speaker argues that while Sabrina may have been involved in an affair with Hearn and may have given him information about her husband's workplace, there is not enough evidence to prove she intended to kill her husband or conspired to do so.
Clips
Valerie Was argues that her client Sabrina Limon was wrongly convicted of murder, soliciting murder, or conspiracy to commit murder due to insufficient corroboration of witness testimony.
1:16:51 - 1:18:16 (01:25)
Summary
Valerie Was argues that her client Sabrina Limon was wrongly convicted of murder, soliciting murder, or conspiracy to commit murder due to insufficient corroboration of witness testimony.
ChapterSabrina Limon's Case: Questioning Intent
EpisodeUnholy Matrimony
Podcast20/20
The sister of Robert Limon, one of the Bakersfield 3 murder victims, speaks out against Sabrina Lamone and Jonathan Hearn, who were both involved in the murder.
1:18:16 - 1:19:45 (01:29)
Summary
The sister of Robert Limon, one of the Bakersfield 3 murder victims, speaks out against Sabrina Lamone and Jonathan Hearn, who were both involved in the murder. She believes that Hearn is the true perpetrator and that Lamone used him to get what she wanted.