Chapter
Supreme Court Justices Discuss the Legitimacy of Past Rulings
Supreme Court Justices engaged in discussions, including a case involving the Miranda right, and expressed concern about the effects of overruling past precedent on the court's legitimacy. There are also concerns regarding the perception of the court as either neutral or political, which tends to be based on personal views of the Constitution.
Clips
The perception of the Supreme Court being politically biased is rooted in whether individuals like the Constitution and its outcomes.
38:03 - 43:47 (05:43)
Summary
The perception of the Supreme Court being politically biased is rooted in whether individuals like the Constitution and its outcomes. Democrats and progressives believe that one of the justices, either Justice Gorsuch or Justice Amy Coney Barrett, was appointed under political and biased circumstances.
ChapterSupreme Court Justices Discuss the Legitimacy of Past Rulings
EpisodeE79: Analyzing the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade with Amy Howe and Tom Goldstein
PodcastAll-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
An analysis of the Supreme Court's decision-making process in cases like Miranda, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, including the influence of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and the discussions among the justices during oral arguments.
43:47 - 48:20 (04:32)
Summary
An analysis of the Supreme Court's decision-making process in cases like Miranda, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, including the influence of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and the discussions among the justices during oral arguments.