Chapter

Supreme Court Justices Discuss the Legitimacy of Past Rulings
listen on SpotifyListen on Youtube
38:03 - 48:20 (10:16)

Supreme Court Justices engaged in discussions, including a case involving the Miranda right, and expressed concern about the effects of overruling past precedent on the court's legitimacy. There are also concerns regarding the perception of the court as either neutral or political, which tends to be based on personal views of the Constitution.

Clips
The perception of the Supreme Court being politically biased is rooted in whether individuals like the Constitution and its outcomes.
38:03 - 43:47 (05:43)
listen on SpotifyListen on Youtube
Supreme Court
Summary

The perception of the Supreme Court being politically biased is rooted in whether individuals like the Constitution and its outcomes. Democrats and progressives believe that one of the justices, either Justice Gorsuch or Justice Amy Coney Barrett, was appointed under political and biased circumstances.

Chapter
Supreme Court Justices Discuss the Legitimacy of Past Rulings
Episode
E79: Analyzing the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade with Amy Howe and Tom Goldstein
Podcast
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
An analysis of the Supreme Court's decision-making process in cases like Miranda, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, including the influence of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and the discussions among the justices during oral arguments.
43:47 - 48:20 (04:32)
listen on SpotifyListen on Youtube
Supreme Court
Summary

An analysis of the Supreme Court's decision-making process in cases like Miranda, Roe v. Wade, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, including the influence of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and the discussions among the justices during oral arguments.

Chapter
Supreme Court Justices Discuss the Legitimacy of Past Rulings
Episode
E79: Analyzing the leaked draft overturning Roe v. Wade with Amy Howe and Tom Goldstein
Podcast
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg