Chapter
Taser's Legal Maneuvers, Excluding Opposing Experts, and Neglected Science
1:00:14 - 1:04:26 (04:12)
Taser convinced a judge to exclude an opposing medical examiner and pathologist's testimony and argued that it was unqualified and unreliable. This raises concerns surrounding Taser's legal strategies and neglected science.
Clips
A researcher's affiliation with a company raises concerns about potential bias in their research, likening it to Fox calling a new hen house design beneficial for hens, while the foxes benefit even more with wider doors and more access to the animals.
1:00:14 - 1:01:18 (01:04)
Summary
A researcher's affiliation with a company raises concerns about potential bias in their research, likening it to Fox calling a new hen house design beneficial for hens, while the foxes benefit even more with wider doors and more access to the animals.
ChapterTaser's Legal Maneuvers, Excluding Opposing Experts, and Neglected Science
EpisodePart Two: Excited Delirium: How Cops Invented A Disease
PodcastBehind the Bastards
Taser has been persuading judges to dismiss cases by excluding medical examiners and pathologists with valid testimony, according to anecdotal evidence.
1:01:18 - 1:04:26 (03:08)
Summary
Taser has been persuading judges to dismiss cases by excluding medical examiners and pathologists with valid testimony, according to anecdotal evidence. Judge William Waldis dismissed Taser from the case of a man whose death was thought to have been caused by the stun gun, due to the company's case against the expert witnesses provided by the victim's family.