Chapter
The Perimeter of Privacy and Free Speech for Ideas
22:38 - 32:31 (09:53)
The freedom of speech for ideas is essential, but the perimeter of privacy raises questions about how far someone's password can protect their private data. It is important for the court to abstract and enforce the essential freedom of speech for infrastructure companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Amazon.
Clips
Ward focused on the need to have a government of people, mission, capacity, technology, commitment, and ideology to reach the epitome of what a government should be.
22:38 - 24:52 (02:13)
Summary
Ward focused on the need to have a government of people, mission, capacity, technology, commitment, and ideology to reach the epitome of what a government should be. However, as generations changed, different beliefs and ideologies created a lack of coherence in government efficiency.
ChapterThe Perimeter of Privacy and Free Speech for Ideas
Episode#163 – Eric Weinstein: Difficult Conversations, Freedom of Speech, and Physics
PodcastLex Fridman Podcast
The abstract concept of data privacy is being challenged by the physical reality of where private data is stored and how it can be protected.
24:53 - 28:20 (03:27)
Summary
The abstract concept of data privacy is being challenged by the physical reality of where private data is stored and how it can be protected. The freedom of speech for ideas is crucial, but the abstraction used to interpret it can have implications for digital speech privacy.
ChapterThe Perimeter of Privacy and Free Speech for Ideas
Episode#163 – Eric Weinstein: Difficult Conversations, Freedom of Speech, and Physics
PodcastLex Fridman Podcast
The speaker shares his concerns about the limitations imposed on free speech, including the creation of free speech zones and the recent banning of Parler from AWS.
28:20 - 32:31 (04:11)
Summary
The speaker shares his concerns about the limitations imposed on free speech, including the creation of free speech zones and the recent banning of Parler from AWS. He believes that free speech is meant to be dangerous and that limiting it only leads to a more dangerous world.