The analysis of the former President's statements and attacks against prosecutors, judges, etc. in a criminal case against him needs to be looked at differently but the basic constitutional and legal principles remain the same. However, the government might ask the court to restrict the former President and his aides from attacking the prosecutors, judges, and witnesses to safeguard their safety.
The Brady Rule, established by the Supreme Court, states that the prosecution cannot withhold evidence that speaks to a person's guilt or innocence. This rule was established in a case involving a man named John who was given a new sentencing trial but maintained his murder conviction.
The speaker received approval to bring a camera into the prison and investigate a murder case, which involves the differences in witness description of the shooter and a massive box of court transcript, police reports and court motions.
Alvin Wright, a victim in a high-profile case, addresses the court before the judge decides whether or not to sentence the defendant to death. He comments on the unfairness of the situation and how it feels like the spectators in the gallery are watching the proceedings as if the people involved are animals in a zoo.
A discussion of the credibility of witness testimony in a shooting case, examining the discrepancies between witnesses' accounts and how it may affect the outcome of the trial.
J.J. reads a statement proclaiming his innocence at his sentencing. Deb and Karen explore the inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and the strange comment J.J. made about being made to do it by Augustus Brown.