The pro-life and pro-choice forces are devoted to stopping the murder of unborn children and maintaining individual liberty, respectively. The principle of stare decisis weakens in cases like this involving the interpretation of the Constitution, which means that an egregiously wrong interpretation must be corrected at some point.
The pro-choice side is upset about the confirmations of two justices and the fact that five of the nine sitting justices were nominated by presidents who lost the popular vote, leading to calls for the end of the Electoral College.
Concerns arise about minority rule in America as the Constitution and the Supreme Court allow politicians who stay in power while suppressing votes and gerrymandering districts, potentially limiting pushback on possible policies such as eliminating contraception and marriage equality.
The leaks of Supreme Court decisions often cause surprise and even outrage among the public. However, protests and mass sentiment may not change the thinking of conservative justices who are unlikely to change their path just because they are facing objections from the people.
The fight for women's rights is clear, but the deeply ingrained misogyny in politics can make it difficult for the issue to gain political traction. Despite this, recent events such as an increase in voter registration in Kansas show a potential shift in attitudes.
Discussing the politics of abortion bans and Supreme Court nominations, the speakers analyze the push and pull of the two parties on this polarizing issue. The key takeaway is that the party that can capture the middle stance on this issue is likely to gain more support.