The U.S. President that succeeds Eisenhower will be the first one to control the U.S nuclear arsenal in an era where a push-button holocaust becomes possible. This raises the question of what qualifications and background a President should have to be worthy of such great power and authority.
The decision to go to war should include considerations about the ethical and moral implications of military strategy, including the use of atomic bombs or nuclear weapons. The importance of upholding these principles is crucial in any conflict, and they need to be taken more seriously in war planning.
In October 1949, physicist Robert Oppenheimer and his colleagues were asked to develop the next level of weaponry above atomic weapons, a hydrogen bomb. The physicists jointly issued a report urging against its creation, believing that mankind was not yet evolved enough for such a deadly weapon, and that there was a unique opportunity to limit the totality of war and thus limit fear and arouse hope by not building the super bomb.
The more detached from reality and evil a person's thoughts and actions are, the less competent they are at their job. It's possible that the Holocaust may have prevented Germany from getting nuclear weapons first due to the hatred of the Jewish people being a hindrance to their competency.
In the pursuit of unquestioning loyalty, patriotism can lead to destructive fanaticism, as seen in the actions of kamikaze pilots during World War II or in a state that is worshipped as a living God.
The emergence of new risks that were unimaginable a few decades ago such as environmental issues, bio weapons, drones and misaligned artificial intelligence are endangering humanity's future, and are now seen as top existential threats.